Воздушно-капельный коронавирус
Apr. 17th, 2020 12:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chuka_lisСоглашусь с авторами статьи
"Hand washing and maintaining social distance are the main measures recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to avoid contracting COVID-19. Unfortunately, these measured do not prevent infection by inhalation of small droplets exhaled by an infected person that can travel distance of meters or tens of meters in the air and carry their viral content. Science explains the mechanisms of such transport and there is evidence that this is a significant route of infection in indoor environments. Despite this, no countries or authorities consider airborne spread of COVID-19 in their regulations to prevent infections transmission indoors. It is therefore extremely important, that the national authorities acknowledge the reality that the virus spreads through air, and recommend that adequate control measures be implemented to prevent further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, in particularly removal of the virus-laden droplets from indoor air by ventilation."
что нет смысла медикам и администраторам игнорировать спосбность коронавиурса к аэросолизации.
Precautions include increased ventilation rate, using natural ventilation, avoiding air recirculation, avoiding staying in another person’s direct air flow, and minimizing the number of people sharing the same environment (Qian et al. 2018). Of significance is maximizing natural ventilation in buildings that are, or can be naturally ventilation and ensuring that the ventilation rate is sufficiently high. These precautions focus on indoor environment of public places, where the risk of infection is greatest, due to the possible buildup of the airborne virus-carrying droplets, the virus likely higher stability in indoor air, and a larger density of people. Public places include in the first instance heath care facilities: while in many hospitals care to provide adequate ventilation is a routine measure, this is not the case in all hospital; often not where new patients are admitted; nursing homes, etc. Shops, offices, schools, restaurants, cruise ships, and of course public transport, is where ventilation practices should reviewed, and ventilation maximized. Also, personal protective equipment (PPE), in particular masks and respirators should be recommended, to be used in public places where density of people is high and ventilation potentially inadequate, as they can protect against infection others (by infected individuals) and being infected (Huang and Morawska, 2019, Leung et al., 2020).
"Hand washing and maintaining social distance are the main measures recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to avoid contracting COVID-19. Unfortunately, these measured do not prevent infection by inhalation of small droplets exhaled by an infected person that can travel distance of meters or tens of meters in the air and carry their viral content. Science explains the mechanisms of such transport and there is evidence that this is a significant route of infection in indoor environments. Despite this, no countries or authorities consider airborne spread of COVID-19 in their regulations to prevent infections transmission indoors. It is therefore extremely important, that the national authorities acknowledge the reality that the virus spreads through air, and recommend that adequate control measures be implemented to prevent further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, in particularly removal of the virus-laden droplets from indoor air by ventilation."
что нет смысла медикам и администраторам игнорировать спосбность коронавиурса к аэросолизации.
Precautions include increased ventilation rate, using natural ventilation, avoiding air recirculation, avoiding staying in another person’s direct air flow, and minimizing the number of people sharing the same environment (Qian et al. 2018). Of significance is maximizing natural ventilation in buildings that are, or can be naturally ventilation and ensuring that the ventilation rate is sufficiently high. These precautions focus on indoor environment of public places, where the risk of infection is greatest, due to the possible buildup of the airborne virus-carrying droplets, the virus likely higher stability in indoor air, and a larger density of people. Public places include in the first instance heath care facilities: while in many hospitals care to provide adequate ventilation is a routine measure, this is not the case in all hospital; often not where new patients are admitted; nursing homes, etc. Shops, offices, schools, restaurants, cruise ships, and of course public transport, is where ventilation practices should reviewed, and ventilation maximized. Also, personal protective equipment (PPE), in particular masks and respirators should be recommended, to be used in public places where density of people is high and ventilation potentially inadequate, as they can protect against infection others (by infected individuals) and being infected (Huang and Morawska, 2019, Leung et al., 2020).
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2020-04-17 08:06 pm (UTC)Смешно: страшный вирус, от которого нет спасения, кроме мытья рук. Самое ужасное, что верят и многие.
no subject
Date: 2020-04-17 08:29 pm (UTC)Евреи испокон веков верили и, как заповедь Божью, мыли руки перед едой. И ничего ужасного с ними не случилось. :)
no subject
Date: 2020-04-17 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:48 pm (UTC)К сожалению, промыть мозги от идиотских предрассудков значительно сложнее.
no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-17 09:46 pm (UTC)а так же пользоваться перчатками, по мере возможности.
я не считаю, что ВОЗ надо "распускать" или отменять.
no subject
Date: 2020-04-17 09:55 pm (UTC)Как буд-то в мытье рук вобще что-то плохое есть, но заявлять, что не нужны ни маски ни перчатки, а только руки мыть, когда у вируса присутствует воздушный способ передачи-это непростительно.
no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 07:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:45 pm (UTC)Потом тянули, "не пандемия, причин для паники нет", пока зараза не расползлась по миру. Так или иначе, но на ВОЗ лежит большая доля отвественности за распространение вируса.
Мне стало многое понятно после сообщений, что в Китае десятки миллионов людей буквально заперты внутри домов, с завариванием подъездов. Ради "каких-то" 80 тысяч, в масштабах страны, никто бы и не почесался.
no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-04-18 04:59 pm (UTC)