Тишина, да? То есть, не верите Вы Нетаньяху, который в 2002 говорил, что Ирак обогащает уран, и использует оружие массового поражения (всякое), и доказывал, что вмешательство США необходимо, не нужны никакие согласия ООН, и США "стабилизирует" ситуацию в регионе. это 2002 год, согласно Нетаньяху, Саддам имеет залежи оружия массового поражения, хим и био, и продолжает обогащать уран для создания ядерного оружия: https://www.cnn.com/2002/US/09/12/netanyahu.cnna/ For example, in 1981 when Saddam was close to creating a nuclear bomb, he had a big central installation in a place called Osirik. He was creating a critical mass of plutonium. He was a very short time before amassing [enough] for an atom bomb. Israel took action. [Israel] didn't consult the U.N., it took action. It just wiped it out. The U.N. summarily condemned Israel and many countries, all countries did, including our dearest friends, the United States. Well, in the hindsight of some two decades, people understand that the U.N. was wrong.. srael, I think in the United States and in other parts of the world, they understand, regardless of the position of their governments, regardless of the position of the U.N., we cannot allow a world in which Saddam acquires nuclear weapons. I have complete faith that inspections will not uncover the myriad sites in which Saddam today can develop, can manufacture the critical mass of plutonium that he needs. He's changed his technology from a centralized plant of the kind that we took out in 1981 precisely because of that. He now has this distributed in little sites, tiny sites, tiny centrifuges the size of washing machines, and they're hidden. we cannot the 21st century to begin with a tyrant like Saddam Hussein, a war criminal who's gassed his own people, we cannot allow him to have atomic bombs. ZAHN: A final question for you this morning. There was a report in one of your newspapers in Israel that said if there is military action and the Iraqis fire a Scud missile into Israel, there is a possibility that Israel would respond with nuclear weapons. What is the likelihood of that happening? NETANYAHU: Well, I don't, I'm sure that wasn't an official statement. But... ZAHN: It was in Ha'aretz [Israeli daily] newspaper. NETANYAHU: Well, because it has its ways. But I think that there's no question that Israel would respond if attacked. I think we, I made that clear as prime minister and the policy has not changed. ..And the whole exercise of bringing down Saddam's regime is to prevent the introduction of these weapons by an unscrupulous, savage regime that would use them. Israel, I think, would be very careful to, and would act prudently and responsibly. But it will respond to an attack, undoubtedly.
Как мы знаем, там была война, работали комиссии разных стран, ООН, МАГАТЭ и тд итп, не нашли никакого оружия ни хим ни био ни обогащенного урана или центрифуг, нчиего того чем стращал Нетаньяху Конгресс США и ООН, и что послужило одной из причин войны США в Ираке.
Тогда же, Израиль стимулировал США "разобраться с Ираном "he told then-US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld ahead of the 2003 Iraq invasion that “you will finish this very quickly. But your primary goal is the Iranian regime. And the Iranian regime is trying to develop a nuclear weapon, "
no subject
Date: 2025-06-22 02:42 am (UTC)это 2002 год, согласно Нетаньяху, Саддам имеет залежи оружия массового поражения, хим и био, и продолжает обогащать уран для создания ядерного оружия:
https://www.cnn.com/2002/US/09/12/netanyahu.cnna/
For example, in 1981 when Saddam was close to creating a nuclear bomb, he had a big central installation in a place called Osirik. He was creating a critical mass of plutonium. He was a very short time before amassing [enough] for an atom bomb. Israel took action. [Israel] didn't consult the U.N., it took action. It just wiped it out.
The U.N. summarily condemned Israel and many countries, all countries did, including our dearest friends, the United States. Well, in the hindsight of some two decades, people understand that the U.N. was wrong..
srael, I think in the United States and in other parts of the world, they understand, regardless of the position of their governments, regardless of the position of the U.N., we cannot allow a world in which Saddam acquires nuclear weapons.
I have complete faith that inspections will not uncover the myriad sites in which Saddam today can develop, can manufacture the critical mass of plutonium that he needs. He's changed his technology from a centralized plant of the kind that we took out in 1981 precisely because of that.
He now has this distributed in little sites, tiny sites, tiny centrifuges the size of washing machines, and they're hidden.
we cannot the 21st century to begin with a tyrant like Saddam Hussein, a war criminal who's gassed his own people, we cannot allow him to have atomic bombs.
ZAHN: A final question for you this morning. There was a report in one of your newspapers in Israel that said if there is military action and the Iraqis fire a Scud missile into Israel, there is a possibility that Israel would respond with nuclear weapons. What is the likelihood of that happening?
NETANYAHU: Well, I don't, I'm sure that wasn't an official statement. But...
ZAHN: It was in Ha'aretz [Israeli daily] newspaper.
NETANYAHU: Well, because it has its ways. But I think that there's no question that Israel would respond if attacked. I think we, I made that clear as prime minister and the policy has not changed.
..And the whole exercise of bringing down Saddam's regime is to prevent the introduction of these weapons by an unscrupulous, savage regime that would use them.
Israel, I think, would be very careful to, and would act prudently and responsibly. But it will respond to an attack, undoubtedly.
Как мы знаем, там была война, работали комиссии разных стран, ООН, МАГАТЭ и тд итп, не нашли никакого оружия ни хим ни био ни обогащенного урана или центрифуг, нчиего того чем стращал Нетаньяху Конгресс США и ООН, и что послужило одной из причин войны США в Ираке.
Тогда же, Израиль стимулировал США "разобраться с Ираном
"he told then-US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld ahead of the 2003 Iraq invasion that “you will finish this very quickly. But your primary goal is the Iranian regime. And the Iranian regime is trying to develop a nuclear weapon, "