Заметки из американского бедлама 4-15-25
Apr. 15th, 2025 08:39 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chuka_lis1) В то время как количество нелегалов, пытающихся пробраться через южную границу США, успало до исторического минимума (вероятно, напуганные рейдами и высылкой иммигрантов в Сальвадорскую тюрьму строгого режима), 8300 в месяц (для сравненя, в 2023 году было 130 000), трамп и ко считают, что сейчас, дело- швах, погранцы не справляются никак, и потому, принято решение, для снижения потока мигрантов - задействовать армию США на границе с Мексикой. При этом федеральные земли передаются военным (110 тыс акров). Причем, подписан указ ввиду того что на границе- "чрезвычайное положение!". Да, исторический минимум пересечений, это ЧП.
Border Patrol recorded around 8,300 apprehensions of migrants who crossed the border unlawfully between ports of entry in February, In January, according to CBP statistics, Border Patrol recorded some 29,100 encounters, down from around 47,300 the month prior. The February numbers are the lowest recorded since FY 2000, the earliest year of monthly data publicly accessible. There were over 130,000 encounters in both February 2023 and 2024.Illegal border crossings spiked at the end of 2023 but started to slope downward in 2024 after the Biden administration implemented new restrictions and Mexican officials ramped up enforcement.
The Army requested the transfer on "an emergency basis," so they could increase regular patrols by federal personnel. The Army will also be able to build infrastructure to prevent illegal immigrants, human traffickers and narcotics from crossing the border. The department noted the crisis along the border is not limited to national security and law enforcement concerns, but also "presents an environmental crisis."
The move comes after President Donald Trump last week signed a memorandum, "Military Mission for Sealing the Southern Border of the United States and Repelling Invasions," directing the secretaries of Defense, Interior, Agriculture and Homeland Security to take control of federal lands "reasonably necessary to enable military activities."The switch in jurisdiction will allow the government to protect sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region, while helping the Army support U.S. Border Patrol operations in securing the border and preventing illegal immigration, according to the Department of the Interior.
"Я тебе, конечно, верю" , что армия будет заправлять - потому что чересчур мноо мигрантов, и потому что надо охранять 20 исчезающих видов флоры и фауны (на природу трампу и ко, начихать, что показывают его указы по разработке заповедных земель и ресурсов, и по зеленому свету для загрязнителей окружающей среды).
Что у республиканцев, двигаюющих армию на юг, на уме, какие варианты?
2) Безумный в Белом доме продолжает кампанию по прессингу высшего образования в США. За несогласие "повиноваться" и отстаивание конституционных прав, трамповская администрация заморозила федеральные контракты с университетом и сопуствующимишколами-госпиталями, на 2.6 млрд долларов. Грозятся на 9 млрд, еще больше. Это конечно, показывает, что даже частные ВУЗы в США "подпитываются" из федерального бюджета, и немало. Те замораживания фондов -аукнутся десяткам, если не сотням тысяч человек. Республиканцы грожают замораживанием фондов -всем университетам Лиги Плюща. Сотни миллионов отобраны у других ведущих университетов страны (МИТ, Колумбия, Стэнфорд, Принстон, итд)
Это, фактически, война Белого дома с ВУЗами, и про-палестинские протесты- это повод, причем неадекватный. Говорящие головы трампа в адимнистрации вещают, что Гарварду всего лишь надо согласиться "не нарушать федеральные законы" (бред сивой кобылы, тк университет их не нарушал), и что " с какой стати деньги налогоплательшиков должны поступать для них, у кого самих в банках есть миллиарды". Далее, трамп угрожает что у Гарварда отберут "безналогвый статус", тк это привиллегия, которой гарвардские "террористы" не заслуживают.
“Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’ Trump wrote. “Remember, Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST!’”
“The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” Harvard President Alan Garber said Monday in a letter to the school’s community.
Я думаю, ни один вменяемый политик не стал бы совершать таких, без сомнения, безумных и очевидно вредных для своенй страны действий.
“All the President is asking, don’t break federal law, and then you can have your federal funding,”
Most of the demands concern how the university operates. The government is asking for a comprehensive mask ban as well as changes to governance, leadership and admissions and an end to diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs.Notably, the government also is seeking to reach into the classroom, demanding “necessary changes” be made “to address bias, improve viewpoint diversity, and end ideological capture,” which fuel antisemitic harassment, the task force’s letter said.
This month Harvard issued $750 million in the bond market that it could use to free up cash flow in case it is unable to reconcile with the task force.
Это как раз правительство, хочет незаконного.
Я не знаю, выстоят ли ВУЗы (Гарвард это только один из около 300, на котореы давят), против гос машины, которая задействована трампом против образования (и не только)..
Сейчас мы видим, что в Белом доме заправляют предатели страны, и там же ошиваются их прихвостни, с не менее шкурными интересами, идущими вразрез с интересами США.
Так же, поскольку все эти репрессии идут под прикрытием "борьбы с антисемитизмом", я не исключаю, что у людей в обществе будет "ответка", и антисемиизм действительно може поднять голову (раз зло творится, под прикрытием: "для блага евреев"), тем более, что проводимая Израилем война и так способствует этому.
3) В обществе идет нормальная борьба с беззаконием, которое творит трамп- группа малых бизнесов судится, тк у трампа не должно быть легальной силы чтобы единолично вводить тарифы. Они, думаю, правы, мог бы хоть Конгрессом прикрыться.
Но, я не уверена, что я увижу положительный результат по их иску- как и по другим, Белый дом отмахивается, врет и продолжает беспредел. Администрация на голубом глазу заявляет, что дефицит бюджета- это есть ЧП и национальное бедствие, которое позволяет принимать экстраординарные меры и активировать военные законы..
A group of US businesses filed a lawsuit Monday arguing that President Donald Trump’s tariffs are illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).The suit was filed in the US Court of International Trade by the Liberty Justice Center, a legal advocacy group arguing on behalf of five businesses that it said have been “severely harmed” by the tariffs. The IEEPA gives the president the authority to impose emergency economic powers in response to an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to national security or the economy, criteria that the plaintiffs in this case say has not been met. The complaint also alleges that the law does not allow for the president to unilaterally impose tariffs.“No one person should have the power to impose taxes that have such vast global economic consequences,” Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, said in a statement. “The Constitution gives the power to set tax rates—including tariffs—to Congress, not the President.”
Что можно сделать судьям и обществу, при том что суденбные постановления Белым домо- игнориурются?
Мало что.
Вообще, если не работают нормальные регуляции, то могут начаться регуляции "снизу". Пока еще общество неразогрето, для того чтобы отстреливать захравшихся и придурковатых, не считая предателей, но дело движется к тому
4) The Trump administration has been accused of ignoring or flat-out defying recent federal court orders, including a Supreme Court decision that it must “facilitate” the release of a Maryland man who was sent in error to a Salvadoran prison. The federal judge presiding over Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case Tuesday chastised the administration for its inaction. If Xinis or another federal judge decides that President Donald Trump and federal officials have failed to comply with their orders, what action can they take to enforce them? One way is a process known as civil contempt. That involves a judge issuing an order holding either the government writ large or an officer of the government in contempt. The judge could impose daily fines or even order someone jailed until the contempt is “purged,” which would happen when the offending party does what the judge wants.Criminal contempt requires charges by the Justice Department, which the president oversees, so it is a less viable option. A president can also revoke criminal contempt by issuing a pardon. Civil contempt, though, is not pardonable.Judges are generally reluctant to hold U.S. government litigants in contempt, but they have done so. During the Obama administration, a judge held the Interior Department in contempt for imposing a moratorium in 2011 on offshore oil drilling after the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Under long-standing precedent, the president cannot be held in contempt because the president is not bound by court injunctions against the federal government.What if a judge decided that jailing an officer of the government would be the only way to enforce a court order? The option is complicated by the fact that federal contempt orders are enforced by U.S. marshals. The marshals are part of the executive branch, not the judicial branch, but their mission is to both "enforce federal laws and provide support to virtually all elements of the federal justice system."The president, who oversees the marshals, could order them not to enforce a contempt order against an executive branch official — although that would violate the law.Another question is what appeals courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court, would do with a contempt ruling against the Trump administration.Parillo’s research found that while district court judges are willing to issue contempt findings, sanctions are rarely upheld on appeal.“There are no opinions of the Supreme Court on the subject," he wrote. "When the courts of appeals hear a potentially relevant case, they usually dispose of it on narrow, case-specific grounds in a deliberate attempt to avoid the bigger and more portentous issues about whether and when judges can use contempt sanctions against the federal government.
5) Зато государство не выполняет свою функцию помощи штатам при стихийных бедствиях. При реальных бедах- бездействие и отказ в финансовой помощи. Очередной отказ- шт Вашингтон.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has denied Washington state's request for emergency relief funds to help repair an estimated $34 million in damage from a deadly bomb cyclone storm system in November “This is another troubling example of the federal government withholding funding,” Ferguson, a Democrat, said. "Washington communities have been waiting for months for the resources they need to fully recover from last winter’s devastating storms, and this decision will cause further delay. We will appeal.”
6) На встрече Большой 7, США заявили, что не будут осуждать рф за ее удары по гражданским в городах Украины- чтобы это "не мешало мирным переговорам и перемирию".
Еще раз продемонстрировали, на чьей США (трамповская администрация) стороне- на стороне агрессора, рф. И что США- на дне.
По хорошему, США надо гнать поганой метлой отовсюду, и из большой 7, и из НАТО, и из торговых альянсов. Именно так надо поступать с предателями, гопниками и мародерами.
The US has told Group of Seven allies it won’t endorse a statement condemning Russia’s deadliest attack on Ukraine this year because it wants to keep negotiations with Moscow on track.Russia fired two short-range ballistic missiles, including one equipped with cluster munitions, at Ukraine’s northeastern city of Sumy on Palm Sunday morning as Ukrainians attended church services. At least 35 people were killed and 119 injured in the attack, including children.President Donald Trump’s administration told allies it couldn’t sign the statement denouncing the attack as it is “working to preserve the space to negotiate peace,” according to people familiar with diplomatic correspondence, as meetings continue between the White House and the Kremlin.Canada, which holds the G-7 presidency this year, told allies that without US endorsement it would be impossible to go ahead with the statement, according to the same people
7) Теперь, ввиду отсутствия Бюро защиты потребителя, банкам можно вернуться к отличной практике большой пени и процентов на проценты, сколько хочешь ( верхнюю планку- убирают)- и это будет здорово, н етолько банкам, но, и потребителю, потому что справедливость восстановится, платить все будут вовремя, % по интересам понизится, кредитные баллы подрастут, и бла бла. Вот как кредиторы заботятся о заемщиках, все для них, дорогих.
Судья в Техасе, согласился с доводами банкиров.
.The banks and other groups had alleged the new rule — proposed last year under the administration of President Joe Biden — violated the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure or CARD Act of 2009, which was enacted to protect consumers from unfair practices by credit card companies. The groups claimed the new rule did not allow credit card issuers “to charge fees that sufficiently account for deterrence or consumer conduct, including with respect to repeat violations.”“The parties agree that, in the Late Fee Rule, the Bureau violated the CARD Act by failing to allow card issuers to ‘charge penalty fees reasonable and proportional to violations,’” attorneys with the CFPB wrote in a joint motion on Monday with the banking groups to vacate the rule.The banks have been pushing hard to stop the late fee rule, due to the potential billions of dollars the banks would lose in revenue. The CFPB estimated when it issued the proposal last year that banks brought in roughly $14 billion in credit card late fees a year. “This is a win for consumers and common sense. If the CFPB’s rule had gone into effect, it would have resulted in more late payments, lower credit scores, higher interest rates and reduced credit access for those who need it most. It would have also penalized the millions of Americans who pay their credit card bills on time and reduced important incentives for consumers to manage their finances,” the banking groups and others said in a joint statement on Tuesday.Even if the lawsuit had gone forward, the banking groups had a good chance of winning as Pittman in a December ruling had said they would have likely prevailed as he found that the new rule violated the CARD Act by not allowing credit card issuers to charge penalty fees that are reasonable and proportional to violations.The CFPB has been in turmoil since the Trump administration earlier this year began dismantling it, targeting it for mass firings and dropping various enforcement actions against companies like Capital One and Rocket Homes. A federal judge last month issued a preliminary injunction that temporarily stopped the agency's demise.
Border Patrol recorded around 8,300 apprehensions of migrants who crossed the border unlawfully between ports of entry in February, In January, according to CBP statistics, Border Patrol recorded some 29,100 encounters, down from around 47,300 the month prior. The February numbers are the lowest recorded since FY 2000, the earliest year of monthly data publicly accessible. There were over 130,000 encounters in both February 2023 and 2024.Illegal border crossings spiked at the end of 2023 but started to slope downward in 2024 after the Biden administration implemented new restrictions and Mexican officials ramped up enforcement.
The Army requested the transfer on "an emergency basis," so they could increase regular patrols by federal personnel. The Army will also be able to build infrastructure to prevent illegal immigrants, human traffickers and narcotics from crossing the border. The department noted the crisis along the border is not limited to national security and law enforcement concerns, but also "presents an environmental crisis."
The move comes after President Donald Trump last week signed a memorandum, "Military Mission for Sealing the Southern Border of the United States and Repelling Invasions," directing the secretaries of Defense, Interior, Agriculture and Homeland Security to take control of federal lands "reasonably necessary to enable military activities."The switch in jurisdiction will allow the government to protect sensitive natural and cultural resources in the region, while helping the Army support U.S. Border Patrol operations in securing the border and preventing illegal immigration, according to the Department of the Interior.
"Я тебе, конечно, верю" , что армия будет заправлять - потому что чересчур мноо мигрантов, и потому что надо охранять 20 исчезающих видов флоры и фауны (на природу трампу и ко, начихать, что показывают его указы по разработке заповедных земель и ресурсов, и по зеленому свету для загрязнителей окружающей среды).
Что у республиканцев, двигаюющих армию на юг, на уме, какие варианты?
2) Безумный в Белом доме продолжает кампанию по прессингу высшего образования в США. За несогласие "повиноваться" и отстаивание конституционных прав, трамповская администрация заморозила федеральные контракты с университетом и сопуствующимишколами-госпиталями, на 2.6 млрд долларов. Грозятся на 9 млрд, еще больше. Это конечно, показывает, что даже частные ВУЗы в США "подпитываются" из федерального бюджета, и немало. Те замораживания фондов -аукнутся десяткам, если не сотням тысяч человек. Республиканцы грожают замораживанием фондов -всем университетам Лиги Плюща. Сотни миллионов отобраны у других ведущих университетов страны (МИТ, Колумбия, Стэнфорд, Принстон, итд)
Это, фактически, война Белого дома с ВУЗами, и про-палестинские протесты- это повод, причем неадекватный. Говорящие головы трампа в адимнистрации вещают, что Гарварду всего лишь надо согласиться "не нарушать федеральные законы" (бред сивой кобылы, тк университет их не нарушал), и что " с какой стати деньги налогоплательшиков должны поступать для них, у кого самих в банках есть миллиарды". Далее, трамп угрожает что у Гарварда отберут "безналогвый статус", тк это привиллегия, которой гарвардские "террористы" не заслуживают.
“Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be Taxed as a Political Entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘Sickness?’ Trump wrote. “Remember, Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST!’”
“The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” Harvard President Alan Garber said Monday in a letter to the school’s community.
Я думаю, ни один вменяемый политик не стал бы совершать таких, без сомнения, безумных и очевидно вредных для своенй страны действий.
“All the President is asking, don’t break federal law, and then you can have your federal funding,”
Most of the demands concern how the university operates. The government is asking for a comprehensive mask ban as well as changes to governance, leadership and admissions and an end to diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs.Notably, the government also is seeking to reach into the classroom, demanding “necessary changes” be made “to address bias, improve viewpoint diversity, and end ideological capture,” which fuel antisemitic harassment, the task force’s letter said.
This month Harvard issued $750 million in the bond market that it could use to free up cash flow in case it is unable to reconcile with the task force.
Это как раз правительство, хочет незаконного.
Я не знаю, выстоят ли ВУЗы (Гарвард это только один из около 300, на котореы давят), против гос машины, которая задействована трампом против образования (и не только)..
Сейчас мы видим, что в Белом доме заправляют предатели страны, и там же ошиваются их прихвостни, с не менее шкурными интересами, идущими вразрез с интересами США.
Так же, поскольку все эти репрессии идут под прикрытием "борьбы с антисемитизмом", я не исключаю, что у людей в обществе будет "ответка", и антисемиизм действительно може поднять голову (раз зло творится, под прикрытием: "для блага евреев"), тем более, что проводимая Израилем война и так способствует этому.
3) В обществе идет нормальная борьба с беззаконием, которое творит трамп- группа малых бизнесов судится, тк у трампа не должно быть легальной силы чтобы единолично вводить тарифы. Они, думаю, правы, мог бы хоть Конгрессом прикрыться.
Но, я не уверена, что я увижу положительный результат по их иску- как и по другим, Белый дом отмахивается, врет и продолжает беспредел. Администрация на голубом глазу заявляет, что дефицит бюджета- это есть ЧП и национальное бедствие, которое позволяет принимать экстраординарные меры и активировать военные законы..
A group of US businesses filed a lawsuit Monday arguing that President Donald Trump’s tariffs are illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).The suit was filed in the US Court of International Trade by the Liberty Justice Center, a legal advocacy group arguing on behalf of five businesses that it said have been “severely harmed” by the tariffs. The IEEPA gives the president the authority to impose emergency economic powers in response to an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to national security or the economy, criteria that the plaintiffs in this case say has not been met. The complaint also alleges that the law does not allow for the president to unilaterally impose tariffs.“No one person should have the power to impose taxes that have such vast global economic consequences,” Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel at the Liberty Justice Center, said in a statement. “The Constitution gives the power to set tax rates—including tariffs—to Congress, not the President.”
Что можно сделать судьям и обществу, при том что суденбные постановления Белым домо- игнориурются?
Мало что.
Вообще, если не работают нормальные регуляции, то могут начаться регуляции "снизу". Пока еще общество неразогрето, для того чтобы отстреливать захравшихся и придурковатых, не считая предателей, но дело движется к тому
4) The Trump administration has been accused of ignoring or flat-out defying recent federal court orders, including a Supreme Court decision that it must “facilitate” the release of a Maryland man who was sent in error to a Salvadoran prison. The federal judge presiding over Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case Tuesday chastised the administration for its inaction. If Xinis or another federal judge decides that President Donald Trump and federal officials have failed to comply with their orders, what action can they take to enforce them? One way is a process known as civil contempt. That involves a judge issuing an order holding either the government writ large or an officer of the government in contempt. The judge could impose daily fines or even order someone jailed until the contempt is “purged,” which would happen when the offending party does what the judge wants.Criminal contempt requires charges by the Justice Department, which the president oversees, so it is a less viable option. A president can also revoke criminal contempt by issuing a pardon. Civil contempt, though, is not pardonable.Judges are generally reluctant to hold U.S. government litigants in contempt, but they have done so. During the Obama administration, a judge held the Interior Department in contempt for imposing a moratorium in 2011 on offshore oil drilling after the Deepwater Horizon disaster. Under long-standing precedent, the president cannot be held in contempt because the president is not bound by court injunctions against the federal government.What if a judge decided that jailing an officer of the government would be the only way to enforce a court order? The option is complicated by the fact that federal contempt orders are enforced by U.S. marshals. The marshals are part of the executive branch, not the judicial branch, but their mission is to both "enforce federal laws and provide support to virtually all elements of the federal justice system."The president, who oversees the marshals, could order them not to enforce a contempt order against an executive branch official — although that would violate the law.Another question is what appeals courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court, would do with a contempt ruling against the Trump administration.Parillo’s research found that while district court judges are willing to issue contempt findings, sanctions are rarely upheld on appeal.“There are no opinions of the Supreme Court on the subject," he wrote. "When the courts of appeals hear a potentially relevant case, they usually dispose of it on narrow, case-specific grounds in a deliberate attempt to avoid the bigger and more portentous issues about whether and when judges can use contempt sanctions against the federal government.
5) Зато государство не выполняет свою функцию помощи штатам при стихийных бедствиях. При реальных бедах- бездействие и отказ в финансовой помощи. Очередной отказ- шт Вашингтон.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency has denied Washington state's request for emergency relief funds to help repair an estimated $34 million in damage from a deadly bomb cyclone storm system in November “This is another troubling example of the federal government withholding funding,” Ferguson, a Democrat, said. "Washington communities have been waiting for months for the resources they need to fully recover from last winter’s devastating storms, and this decision will cause further delay. We will appeal.”
6) На встрече Большой 7, США заявили, что не будут осуждать рф за ее удары по гражданским в городах Украины- чтобы это "не мешало мирным переговорам и перемирию".
Еще раз продемонстрировали, на чьей США (трамповская администрация) стороне- на стороне агрессора, рф. И что США- на дне.
По хорошему, США надо гнать поганой метлой отовсюду, и из большой 7, и из НАТО, и из торговых альянсов. Именно так надо поступать с предателями, гопниками и мародерами.
The US has told Group of Seven allies it won’t endorse a statement condemning Russia’s deadliest attack on Ukraine this year because it wants to keep negotiations with Moscow on track.Russia fired two short-range ballistic missiles, including one equipped with cluster munitions, at Ukraine’s northeastern city of Sumy on Palm Sunday morning as Ukrainians attended church services. At least 35 people were killed and 119 injured in the attack, including children.President Donald Trump’s administration told allies it couldn’t sign the statement denouncing the attack as it is “working to preserve the space to negotiate peace,” according to people familiar with diplomatic correspondence, as meetings continue between the White House and the Kremlin.Canada, which holds the G-7 presidency this year, told allies that without US endorsement it would be impossible to go ahead with the statement, according to the same people
7) Теперь, ввиду отсутствия Бюро защиты потребителя, банкам можно вернуться к отличной практике большой пени и процентов на проценты, сколько хочешь ( верхнюю планку- убирают)- и это будет здорово, н етолько банкам, но, и потребителю, потому что справедливость восстановится, платить все будут вовремя, % по интересам понизится, кредитные баллы подрастут, и бла бла. Вот как кредиторы заботятся о заемщиках, все для них, дорогих.
Судья в Техасе, согласился с доводами банкиров.
.The banks and other groups had alleged the new rule — proposed last year under the administration of President Joe Biden — violated the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure or CARD Act of 2009, which was enacted to protect consumers from unfair practices by credit card companies. The groups claimed the new rule did not allow credit card issuers “to charge fees that sufficiently account for deterrence or consumer conduct, including with respect to repeat violations.”“The parties agree that, in the Late Fee Rule, the Bureau violated the CARD Act by failing to allow card issuers to ‘charge penalty fees reasonable and proportional to violations,’” attorneys with the CFPB wrote in a joint motion on Monday with the banking groups to vacate the rule.The banks have been pushing hard to stop the late fee rule, due to the potential billions of dollars the banks would lose in revenue. The CFPB estimated when it issued the proposal last year that banks brought in roughly $14 billion in credit card late fees a year. “This is a win for consumers and common sense. If the CFPB’s rule had gone into effect, it would have resulted in more late payments, lower credit scores, higher interest rates and reduced credit access for those who need it most. It would have also penalized the millions of Americans who pay their credit card bills on time and reduced important incentives for consumers to manage their finances,” the banking groups and others said in a joint statement on Tuesday.Even if the lawsuit had gone forward, the banking groups had a good chance of winning as Pittman in a December ruling had said they would have likely prevailed as he found that the new rule violated the CARD Act by not allowing credit card issuers to charge penalty fees that are reasonable and proportional to violations.The CFPB has been in turmoil since the Trump administration earlier this year began dismantling it, targeting it for mass firings and dropping various enforcement actions against companies like Capital One and Rocket Homes. A federal judge last month issued a preliminary injunction that temporarily stopped the agency's demise.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 08:54 am (UTC)"Maga" on the rise, isn't it?
Если уедут учОные, a места найдутсО и в Канаде, и GB и во Франции.. то что тогда современная Омерика без учОных? ничто.. Ну, разве что военка.
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 04:00 pm (UTC)Штаты проводят свою культурную революцию...
1. Почему молчат демократы?
2. Checks and balances уже все, да?
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 05:02 pm (UTC)но законно сделать - ничего не могут.
как, вобщем то, и судьи (об этом пункт 4)
Будут ли демократы устраивать" силовой захват власти"? пока предположу, что нет.
2) да, Checks and balances с приходом трампа к власти- уже все, см более ранние "заметки" и про "республиканскую партию".
Снайдер сделал правильный шаг по своему спасению. Правда, трамп собирается превратить Канаду в 51 штат..
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 05:06 pm (UTC)Фашизм, по крайней мере поначалу, это движение "примитивное", наука и образование для него-второстепенны, что мы и наблюдаем.
Да, во времена потенциальной МАГА, страна не была хорошо образованной и не была на переднем рубеже науки. потому, чего удивляться, что США туда катятся, стараниями "ностальгирующих" республиканских узурпаторов?
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 05:04 pm (UTC)