Чувствительность быстрых тестов
Nov. 23rd, 2020 08:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
chuka_lisПоявилась еще одна статья о том, на сколько чувствительны и специфичны экспресс-тесты на коронавиурс. Результаты примерно такие же, как и в другом исследовании:
Чувствительность экспресс-тестов (2 типов, Абботт и Роше) примерно 85-89%, что значит: 10-15 человек из сотни с коронавирусом могут получить негативный результат при экспресс-тесте.
Ну или, грубо говоря, этот метод "пропустит" каждого десятого.
Шансы на правильный результат теста выше, если человек уже симптоматичен.
Специфичность экспресс тестов 99.7-100% (по сравнению с ПЦР методом, который, конечо же, тоже имеет свою погрешность).
We performed a prospective, single-center, point of care validation of two antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) in comparison to RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs.
Findings. Between October 9th and 23rd, 2020, 1064 participants were enrolled.
The PanbioTM Covid-19 Ag Rapid Test device (Abbott) was validated in 535 participants, with 106 positive Ag-RDT results out of 124 positive RT-PCR individuals, yielding a sensitivity of 85.5%
Specificity was 100.0%
The Standard Q Ag-RDT (SD Biosensor, Roche) was validated in 529 participants, with 170 positive Ag-RDT results out of 191 positive RT-PCR individuals, yielding a sensitivity of 89.0% .
One false positive result was obtained in 338 RT-PCR negative individuals, yielding a specificity of 99.7% .
For individuals presenting with fever 1-5 days post symptom onset, combined Ag-RDT sensitivity was above 95%.
Interpretation. We provide an independent validation of two widely available commercial Ag-RDTs, both meeting WHO criteria of at least 80% sensitivity and at least 97% specificity. Although less sensitive than RT-PCR, these assays could be beneficial due to their rapid results, ease of use, and independence from existing laboratory structures.
Testing criteria focusing on patients with typical symptoms in their early symptomatic period onset could further increase diagnostic value.
Чувствительность экспресс-тестов (2 типов, Абботт и Роше) примерно 85-89%, что значит: 10-15 человек из сотни с коронавирусом могут получить негативный результат при экспресс-тесте.
Ну или, грубо говоря, этот метод "пропустит" каждого десятого.
Шансы на правильный результат теста выше, если человек уже симптоматичен.
Специфичность экспресс тестов 99.7-100% (по сравнению с ПЦР методом, который, конечо же, тоже имеет свою погрешность).
We performed a prospective, single-center, point of care validation of two antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) in comparison to RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs.
Findings. Between October 9th and 23rd, 2020, 1064 participants were enrolled.
The PanbioTM Covid-19 Ag Rapid Test device (Abbott) was validated in 535 participants, with 106 positive Ag-RDT results out of 124 positive RT-PCR individuals, yielding a sensitivity of 85.5%
Specificity was 100.0%
The Standard Q Ag-RDT (SD Biosensor, Roche) was validated in 529 participants, with 170 positive Ag-RDT results out of 191 positive RT-PCR individuals, yielding a sensitivity of 89.0% .
One false positive result was obtained in 338 RT-PCR negative individuals, yielding a specificity of 99.7% .
For individuals presenting with fever 1-5 days post symptom onset, combined Ag-RDT sensitivity was above 95%.
Interpretation. We provide an independent validation of two widely available commercial Ag-RDTs, both meeting WHO criteria of at least 80% sensitivity and at least 97% specificity. Although less sensitive than RT-PCR, these assays could be beneficial due to their rapid results, ease of use, and independence from existing laboratory structures.
Testing criteria focusing on patients with typical symptoms in their early symptomatic period onset could further increase diagnostic value.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2020-11-24 04:44 am (UTC)Хотя, наверно, было бы лучше наоборот. 99.7-100% чувствительность и 85-89% специфичность.
no subject
Date: 2020-11-24 05:47 am (UTC)если б наоборот- да, может и было б лучше- ведь если есть специфичность 85-89%- значит, там скорее всего, похожий коронавирус, и человек не здоров все равно.
no subject
Date: 2020-11-24 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-11-24 10:08 am (UTC)