В Англии прецедентное право. какое отношение это имеет к Украине? в Великобритании закона подобного тому что есть в Украине- нет ( а есть только этические правила) even though there is no legal obligation on the media in the UK to warn individuals of any intention to publish material affecting their privacy. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-506-0416?originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=pluk кроме того, судя по публикациям, этот случай как раз из серии наоборот. Товарищ оказался недоволен тем, что без его разрешения опубликовали его фото, и обратился в суд, и выиграл. Mr Mosley accepted that the events shown occurred, but denied that there was any Nazi theme. Arguing that the published material was inherently private in nature, he brought proceedings for breach of confidence and invasion of privacy, claiming exemplary damages. As the footage was widely accessible, Mr Mosley failed to obtain an interim injunction preventing further publication (see Legal update, High Court refuses injunction to stop Max Mosley video being shown on newspaper website). At the full trial in July 2008 the High Court held that Mr Mosley had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to sexual activities carried on by consenting adults on private property, and rejected the defendant's claim that the events had a Nazi theme, or that their publication could be justified on the basis that they were illegal or immoral. The court awarded damages of £60,000 but rejected the claim for exemplary damages. я не вижу, каким образом этот случая отвевает на поставленный мной вопрос.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2019-04-11 11:25 pm (UTC)какое отношение это имеет к Украине?
в Великобритании закона подобного тому что есть в Украине- нет ( а есть только этические правила)
even though there is no legal obligation on the media in the UK to warn individuals of any intention to publish material affecting their privacy. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/4-506-0416?originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=pluk
кроме того, судя по публикациям, этот случай как раз из серии наоборот. Товарищ оказался недоволен тем, что без его разрешения опубликовали его фото, и обратился в суд, и выиграл.
Mr Mosley accepted that the events shown occurred, but denied that there was any Nazi theme. Arguing that the published material was inherently private in nature, he brought proceedings for breach of confidence and invasion of privacy, claiming exemplary damages.
As the footage was widely accessible, Mr Mosley failed to obtain an interim injunction preventing further publication (see Legal update, High Court refuses injunction to stop Max Mosley video being shown on newspaper website). At the full trial in July 2008 the High Court held that Mr Mosley had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to sexual activities carried on by consenting adults on private property, and rejected the defendant's claim that the events had a Nazi theme, or that their publication could be justified on the basis that they were illegal or immoral. The court awarded damages of £60,000 but rejected the claim for exemplary damages.
я не вижу, каким образом этот случая отвевает на поставленный мной вопрос.